In recent years stakeholders have sought greater involvement in wildlife ma
nagement. Responding to their expectations, wildlife agencies have found th
emselves dealing with the daunting task of balancing conflicting interests.
Agencies have addressed this challenge by experimenting with numerous tech
niques to involve stakeholders in wildlife management. One recent innovatio
n, co-management, requires a partnership in which agencies and stakeholders
share responsibility. Some agencies concerned about loss of authority have
viewed co-management with skepticism; others have developed policies and t
aken actions that have kept them in a leadership role, even while delegatin
g some responsibility to stakeholders. These proactive agencies frequently
have developed a more supportive, educated, and involved public. Go-managem
ent has proved effective in varied situations throughout North America, inc
luding management of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in suburban
areas of New York State and goose (e.g., Branta canadensis minima) managem
ent in remote parts of Alaska.