Rv. Tappeta et al., Interactive physical programming: Tradeoff analysis and decision making inmulticriteria optimization, AIAA J, 38(5), 2000, pp. 917-926
This research focuses on multiobjective system design and optimization. The
goal is to extend the physical programming (Messac, A., "Physical Programm
ing: Effective Optimization for Design," AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1996
, pp. 149-158). Framework to develop an interactive physical programming (I
PP) framework that takes into account the designer's or the decision maker'
s (DM's) preferences during the optimization process, and allows for design
exploration at a given Pareto design. The IPP framework provides the DM wi
th Pareto-sensitivity information, a Pareto surface approximation, a formal
decision-making strategy, and a Pareto visualization tool for efficient de
sign (or Pareto surface) exploration at a given Pareto design, The IPP has
been successfully applied to two test problems. The first problem consists
of a set of simple analytical expressions for its objective and constraints
, The second problem is the design and sizing of a high-performance and low
-cost 10-bar structure that has multiple objectives. Results indicate that
the IPP framework is effective in capturing the local preferences of the DM
. The Pareto designs that reflect the DM's preferences can be efficiently g
enerated using the IPP framework. More importantly, the IPP provides the DM
with a Pareto visualization tool that facilitates the study of existing tr
adeoffs between objectives in a physically meaningful way.