Salvage therapy with abacavir plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a protease inhibitor in heavily pre-treated HIV-1 infected patients
N. Khanna et al., Salvage therapy with abacavir plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a protease inhibitor in heavily pre-treated HIV-1 infected patients, AIDS, 14(7), 2000, pp. 791-799
Background: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may fail, especial
ly in pretreated patients.
Objective: To examine retrospectively whether heavily pre-treated patients
not responding to HAART at least once respond to a salvage therapy with aba
cavir, a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus a non-nucle
oside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and one or two prote
ase inhibitors (PI).
Patients: We retrospectively identified and analysed patients followed in t
he Swiss HIV Cohort Study with > 1000 HIV RNA copies/ml on HAART, naive to
abacavir who were switched to abacavir plus one NNRTI (efavirenz or nevirap
ine) and one or two PI which had not been used in the previous HAART.
Results: Of 23 identified HIV-infected patients with four (median) therapy
changes before salvage, 10 patients (43%) achieved a decrease of plasma HIV
RNA > 0.5 log(10) at 6 months of therapy. After 6 months only two patients
had an HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml, one of them < 50 copies/ml. Seven patien
ts increased their CD4 cell counts by > 30% above baseline. Three patients,
all with CD4 cell counts < 100 x 10(6)/1 before salvage therapy had a > 30
% decline in CD4 cell count. An extended number of resistance-associated mu
tations was found in almost all patients at baseline. One patient had two n
ew AIDS-defining events. Five patients (22%) discontinued treatment because
of side-effects, mainly occurrence of a rash.
Conclusion: Salvage therapy in intensively pre-treated patients has a low v
irological success rate despite usage of abacavir and NNRTI. Nevertheless,
this did not correlate with immunological and clinical course. This study e
mphasizes the difficulty of second-line treatment in HIV-1 infection and st
resses the need for new compounds. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.