Objective: Hearing loss remains the most common symptom associated with aco
ustic neuroma. This study documents the audiometric findings from 721 acous
tic neuroma procedures.
Study Design: This was a retrospective study. The preoperative audiometric
data were compiled and were analyzed by patient age, gender, tumor size, ti
me of surgery, and neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF 2). Postoperative audiometr
ic data were arranged and compiled in the same way. The hearing classificat
ion proposed by the AAO-HNS was applied to all preoperative and postoperati
ve cases.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: Surgically confirmed acoustic neuroma patients who had not previo
usly received surgical or radiosurgical therapy. Patients underwent surgery
by the retrosigmoid approach.
Intervention: Surgical removal of an acoustic neuroma.
Main Outcome Result: Provision of pure tone and speech data from a group of
acoustic neuroma patients, including application of the recently introduce
d and accepted AAO-HNS hearing classification system.
Results: Preoperative audiometric data were obtained from 694 of 721 patien
ts (96%), of whom 619 had measurable hearing. Postoperative audiometry was
performed on 606 patients; 152 had usable data. The combined preoperative a
udiometric data revealed a high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Word
recognition was servicable. The postoperative pure tones and word recogniti
on scores were worse than preoperative scores. Age, gender, tumor size, and
time of surgery had some impact on the preoperative hearing and the postop
erative result; NF 2 did not.
Conclusions: The study confirms that hearing alteration is almost universal
in acoustic neuroma patients. Hearing preservation is possible in a signif
icant number of cases; however, the postoperative auditory function tends t
o be worse.