Comparison of atenolol, amlodipine, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan for antihypertensive treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
H. Kraiczi et al., Comparison of atenolol, amlodipine, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan for antihypertensive treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, AM J R CRIT, 161(5), 2000, pp. 1423-1428
We compared the effects of atenolol (50 mg), amlodipine (5 mg), enalapril (
20 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg), and losartan (50 mg) given in once-dai
ly oral doses on office and ambulatory blood pressures (BPs) in patients wi
th hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Each of 40 randomized pa
tients was treated in sequence with two of the five agents (balanced incomp
lete block design). Treatment periods lasted 6 wk and were separated by a 3
-wk washout period. Changes in BP from baseline with the study substances w
ere compared through analysis of variance. Office diastolic BP, our primary
outcome variable, was most effectively lowered by atenolol, with all four
post hoc differences between atenolol and the remaining substances being st
atistically significant. Reductions in office systolic and daytime ambulato
ry BP were not significantly different among the five compounds. However, a
tenolol reduced mean nighttime ambulatory diastolic and systolic BP more ef
fectively than did amlodipine, enalapril, or losartan (but not hydrochlorot
hiazide). Severity of sleep-disordered breathing and well-being during the
day were not significantly influenced by any of the study compounds. Our fi
ndings are in accordance with the hypothesis that an overactivity of the sy
mpathetic nervous system is an important mechanism behind the development o
r maintenance of hypertension in patients with OSA.