Tadpole locomotion: Axial movement and tail functions in a largely vertebraeless vertebrate

Citation
Kv. Hoff et Rj. Wassersug, Tadpole locomotion: Axial movement and tail functions in a largely vertebraeless vertebrate, AM ZOOLOG, 40(1), 2000, pp. 62-76
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST
ISSN journal
00031569 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
62 - 76
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1569(200002)40:1<62:TLAMAT>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Tadpoles are exceptional among vertebrates in lacking vertebrae along most of their body axis. Their caudal myotomes are also unusually simple for fre e-living vertebrates. This overall morphological simplicity, in theory, mak es tadpoles good models for exploring how vertebrates control undulatory mo vements. We used electromyography (EMC), high speed cine, computational flu id dynamics (CFD), and mechanical tissue testing to understand how Rana tad poles regulate their locomotion. Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles have several patterns of muscle activi ty, each specific to a particular swimming behavior. Ipsilateral muscles in the tail were active either in series or simultaneously, depending on the tadpole's velocity, and linear and angular acceleration, When R. catesbeian a larvae swam at their natural preferred tail beat frequency, muscles at th e caudal end of their tail were inactive. Mechanical tests of tissue furthe r suggest that the preferred tail beat frequency closely matches the resona nce frequency of the tail thus minimizing the energetic cost of locomotion, CFD modeling has demonstrated that the characteristically high amplitude os cillations at a tadpole's snout during normal rectilinear locomotion do not add to drag, as might be supposed, but rather help generate thrust. Mechan ical testing of the tadpole tail fin has revealed that the fin is viscoelas tic and stiffer in small rather than large deformations. This property (amo ng others) allows the tail to be light and flexible, yet stiff enough to ge nerate thrust in the absence of a bony or cartilaginous skeleton. Many recent studies have documented predator-induced polyphenism in tadpole tail shape. We suggest that this developmental plasticity in locomotor str uctures is more common in tadpoles than in other vertebrates because tadpol es do not need to reform skeletal tissue to change overall caudal shape. Tadpole tail fins and tip, in the absence of any skeleton, are fragile and often scarred by predators. Based on the high incidence of tail fin injury seen in tadpoles in the wild, we suggest that the tadpole tail fin and tip may play an ecological role that goes beyond serving as a propeller to help tadpoles stay beyond predators' reach. Those soft tissue axial structures, by failing under very small tensile loads, mag also allow tadpoles to tear free of a predator's grasp.