Response criteria for NHL: Importance of 'normal' lymph node size and correlations with response rates

Citation
Aj. Grillo-lopez et al., Response criteria for NHL: Importance of 'normal' lymph node size and correlations with response rates, ANN ONCOL, 11(4), 2000, pp. 399-408
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
09237534 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
399 - 408
Database
ISI
SICI code
0923-7534(200004)11:4<399:RCFNIO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: Oncologic literature cites many different definitions of critic al response measurements. Patients and methods: Response criteria (RC) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NH L) were developed by lymphoma experts, endorsed by international lymphoma c linicians, and applied to a 166-patient rituximab (Rituxan(R), MabThera(R)) trial by a third-party, blinded panel of NHL experts (LEXCOR). Retrospecti vely, we analyzed this data using variations of the original RC and compari ng with recently published RC. Results: The definition of a 'normal' lymph node affected the complete resp onse (CR) rate (less than or equal to 1.0 x 1.0 cm, 6%; less than or equal to 1.5 x 1.5 cm, 18%; less than or equal to 2.0 x 2.0 cm, 28%); overall res ponse rate (ORR) was not affected. CR rates increased progressively without greater than or equal to 28 days response confirmation: 12% vs. 6% (less t han or equal to 1.0 x 1.0 cm), 26% vs. 18% (less than or equal to 1.5 x 1.5 cm), and 36% vs. 28% (less than or equal to 2.0 x 2.0 cm). CR rate and dur ation of response (DR) were unaffected when only the six largest, rather th an all lesions, were measured. When the new RC were applied, CR rate (32%) was higher and DR (13.9 months) and time to progression (15.6 months) were shorter in complete responders. Conclusions: Standard RC must be consistently and rigorously applied for ac curate comparisons between studies.