Epidemiology of de novo acute renal failure in hospitalized African Americans - Comparing community-acquired vs hospital-acquired disease

Citation
Ci. Obialo et al., Epidemiology of de novo acute renal failure in hospitalized African Americans - Comparing community-acquired vs hospital-acquired disease, ARCH IN MED, 160(9), 2000, pp. 1309-1313
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
160
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1309 - 1313
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(20000508)160:9<1309:EODNAR>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: The high incidence and prevalence of endstage kidney disease am ong African Americans is well known, but the epidemiology of acute renal fa ilure (ARF) among African Americans is unknown. This study was designed to determine the incidence, associated risk factors, and prognosis of ARF in h ospitalized African Americans and to compare these variables in hospital-ac quired ARF (HA-ARF) against community-acquired ARF (CA-ARF). Methods: A 3-year (1994-1996), computer-assisted retrospective analysis of hospital discharges with confirmed diagnoses of ARF. One hundred of 240 cas es met the inclusion criteria for de novo ARF. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical profiles of all patients were retrieved and subdivided into CA-AR F and HA-ARF. Both analysis of variance and X-2 tests were used for analysi s. Survival regression used both the Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Me ier models. Results: The incidence of CA-ARF was 3.5 times greater than that of HA-ARF (0.55% vs 0.15%). The mean age of all patients was 54 years with a 67% male predominance. There were no significant differences in age, sex, peak seru m creatinine levels, or underlying medical history. Prerenal causes of ARF were more common among CA-ARF than HA-ARF (35% vs 19%; P = .07),but intrare nal causes were more common among HA-ARF (81% vs 55%; P = .07). All cases o f obstruction occurred in CA-ARF. Mortality was higher in HA-ARF (59% vs 33 %; P = .03), and the incidence of recognized predictors of mortality was hi gher in patients with HA-ARF than in those with CA-ARF: oliguria (59% vs 35 %; P = .04); sepsis (73% vs 35%; P = .004); stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or mechanical ventilation (55% vs 6%; P<.001); and multiorgan failur e (59% vs 24%; P = .002). Those with HA-ARF were twice as likely to require dialysis as those with CA-ARF. The mortality was high in younger patients with CA-ARF and in older patients with HA-ARF, but the dialysis-related mor tality rate was 3-fold higher among patients with HA-ARF. While mean rt SD length of hospital stay was more prolonged in KA-ARF than CA-ARF (26 +/- 28 days vs 12 +/- 11 days; P<.001), the 120-day survival rate was lower in HA -ARF than CA-ARF (43% vs 66%; P = .05). The HA-ARF status was associated wi th a relative risk of 2.5 (confidence interval, 1.1-5.5; P = .03) for short ened survival. Conclusions: The overall epidemiologic characteristics of ARF among hospita lized African Americans seem to be comparable to those in whites, but the d ifference in incidence between CA-ARF and HA-ARF was much higher in African Americans. In view of the high mortality and morbidity rates associated wi th ARF and the fact that younger African American patients with CA-ARF were more likely to die than their older counterparts, we recommend that renal failure awareness be incorporated into community-based health educational p rograms in African American populations.