Objective.-To describe a comprehensive integrated laboratory quality manage
ment plan for gynecologic cytology.
Design and Setting.-Cytopathology laboratory performance monitors with inte
rlaboratory comparison.
Results.-Utilizing College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies, the C
ollege of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervi
covaginal Cytology, and other published data, a quality management program
for gynecologic cytology involving diagnostic statistics, screening limits
and competency assessment, retrospective rescreening, real-time rescreening
, cytology-biopsy correlation, follow-up of patients with abnormal cytology
results, turnaround time, examination of unknown slides (survey programs),
and new technology is described.
Conclusion.-Regular coordinated monitoring of performance, with longitudina
l and interlaboratory comparison utilizing the methods described, provides
an opportunity to optimize gynecologic cytology service.