Testicular regression syndrome - A clinical and pathologic study of 11 cases

Citation
Se. Spires et al., Testicular regression syndrome - A clinical and pathologic study of 11 cases, ARCH PATH L, 124(5), 2000, pp. 694-698
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039985 → ACNP
Volume
124
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
694 - 698
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9985(200005)124:5<694:TRS-AC>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Context.-The vanishing or regressed testis is an entity well known to urolo gists and pediatric surgeons, affecting approximately 5% of patients with c ryptorchidism. However, there is little review and discussion of this entit y among pathologists with only 2 of 40 published reviews of testicular regr ession syndrome (TRS) found in the pathologic literature. Objectives.-To assess recognition of TRS among a subset of pathologists and to determine the applicability of histologic criteria for TRS as published . Design.-An 8-year retrospective review of cases submitted as atrophic or re gressed testis was performed. Original diagnosis and diagnosis after review were compared to assess pathologic recognition of TRS. Pathologic assessme nt included identification of vas deferens, epididymis, dystrophic calcific ation, hemosiderin, dominant vein, pampiniform plexus-like vessels, and vas cularized fibrous nodule formation. At minimum, the presence of a vasculari zed fibrous nodule (VFN) with calcification or hemosiderin or VFN with cord element(s) was required for diagnosis. Setting and Participants.-Medical records and pathologic specimens of patie nts undergoing surgery for cryptorchidism or with specimens reviewed at a m edium-sized university hospital were analyzed. Results.-The original diagnosis in 3 (23%) of 13 cases was that of TRS. On secondary review, 11 (85%) of 13 cases showed features consistent with TRS. The diagnoses both before and after review showed a concurrence of 23% (3/ 13 cases). Two (15%) of 13 cases were correctly recognized and diagnosed as TRS at primary review; 1 case originally thought to represent TRS was not confirmed. Pathologic features correlated well with those reported in the l iterature. Among all 13 cases, the 11 confirmed TRS cases showed VFN in 11 (85%), intranodular calcification in 8 (62%), intranodular hemosiderin in 9 (69%), vas deferens in 9 (69%), epididymal structures in 5 (38%), and a do minant venous structure in 11 (85%). The average size of the VFN was 1.1 cm . Conclusion.-A urologic and pediatric surgical problem, TRS may be unrecogni zed by many practicing pathologists. In the typical situation in which a bl ind ending spermatic cord is submitted for tissue analysis, characterizatio n of such cases as consistent with regressed testis is desirable and achiev able in a high percentage of cases. Pathologists may play a pivotal role in management of these patients since histologic confirmation of the testis a s regressed reassures the surgeon and the family of the correctness of diag nosis and can eliminate the necessity for further intervention.