C. Chin et al., Comparison of exogenous surfactant and positive end-expiratory pressure therapies in a model of human breast milk-induced acute lung injury in rabbits, BR J ANAEST, 84(5), 2000, pp. 600-607
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
To evaluate surfactant and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) as poten
tial therapies for the acute lung injury after tracheal instillation of 0.8
ml kg(-1) human breast milk (HBM) acidified to pH 1.8, adult white rabbits
were anaesthetized, tracheostomized, ventilated and randomized to (six rab
bits per treatment): (i) no treatment after HEM (control); (ii) exogenous B
ovine surfactant (100 mg kg(-1)) 1 h after HEM; (iii) PEEP-pre (0.5 kPa PEE
P) before and after HEM; or (iv) PEEP-post (0.5 kPa PEEP) after HEM. A fift
h group of six rabbits received no tracheal instillate (no aspirate). The a
lveolar to arteria[ oxygen tension gradient (A-aDO(2)) and dynamic complian
ce were measured pre-injury and hourly for 4 h. At post-mortem, the lungs w
ere examined histologically. A-aDO(2) in all four HEM-injured groups increa
sed to a maximum at 1 h post-injury; A-aDO(2) then returned towards the bas
eline in the surfactant and PEEP-post groups, but remained increased in the
PEEP-pre and control groups. Dynamic compliance decreased in all four HEM-
injured groups. A-aDO(2) and compliance were unchanged in the no aspirate g
roup. Bronchoalveolar architecture after surfactant therapy was normal. We
conclude that surfactant is a more effective therapy for HEM-induced lung i
njury than either 0.5 kPa PEEP-post or PEEP-pre injury.