Ak. Gupta et al., In vitro susceptibility of the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine, BR J DERM, 142(4), 2000, pp. 758-765
Fifty-five strains, either authentic or ex-type. of seven Malassezia specie
s were investigated for ill vitro susceptibility to various concentrations
(0.03-64.0 mu g/mL) of three azole drugs. ketoconazole, voriconazole and it
raconazole. as well as the allylamine terbinafine, using the agar dilution
method. All strains of the seven Malassezia species were susceptible to the
three azole drugs at low concentrations. M. furfur, M. sympodialis. M. slo
offiae. M. pachydermatis. M. globosa. M. obtusa and M. restricta were most
sensitive to ketoconazole and itraconazole, with minimum inhibitory concent
rations (MICs) ranging from less than or equal to 0.03 to 0.125 mu g/mL. Th
e recently introduced antifungal, voriconazole. was also very effective, wi
th MICH, values less than or equal to 0.03 mu g/mL for 80% of strains. MICs
of terbinafine against the seven Malassezia species ranged from less than
or equal to 0.03 to 64.0 mu g/mL. There were variations in susceptibility o
f the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole. itraconazole
and terbinafine. Strains of M. furfur, M. globosa and M. obtusa were more t
olerant to terbinafine than the remaining Malassezia species; hi. sympodial
is was highly susceptible. M. furfur strains tested with terbinafine ranged
from highly susceptible to relatively resistant. Correct identification of
Malassezia species could facilitate selection of appropriate antifungal th
erapy.