In vitro susceptibility of the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine

Citation
Ak. Gupta et al., In vitro susceptibility of the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine, BR J DERM, 142(4), 2000, pp. 758-765
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
142
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
758 - 765
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(200004)142:4<758:IVSOTS>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Fifty-five strains, either authentic or ex-type. of seven Malassezia specie s were investigated for ill vitro susceptibility to various concentrations (0.03-64.0 mu g/mL) of three azole drugs. ketoconazole, voriconazole and it raconazole. as well as the allylamine terbinafine, using the agar dilution method. All strains of the seven Malassezia species were susceptible to the three azole drugs at low concentrations. M. furfur, M. sympodialis. M. slo offiae. M. pachydermatis. M. globosa. M. obtusa and M. restricta were most sensitive to ketoconazole and itraconazole, with minimum inhibitory concent rations (MICs) ranging from less than or equal to 0.03 to 0.125 mu g/mL. Th e recently introduced antifungal, voriconazole. was also very effective, wi th MICH, values less than or equal to 0.03 mu g/mL for 80% of strains. MICs of terbinafine against the seven Malassezia species ranged from less than or equal to 0.03 to 64.0 mu g/mL. There were variations in susceptibility o f the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole. itraconazole and terbinafine. Strains of M. furfur, M. globosa and M. obtusa were more t olerant to terbinafine than the remaining Malassezia species; hi. sympodial is was highly susceptible. M. furfur strains tested with terbinafine ranged from highly susceptible to relatively resistant. Correct identification of Malassezia species could facilitate selection of appropriate antifungal th erapy.