M. Preti et al., Inter-observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: results of an European collaborative study, BR J OBST G, 107(5), 2000, pp. 594-599
Objective To evaluate the inter-observer variability of vulvar intraepithel
ial neoplasia diagnosis and grading system.
Design Prospective study.
Sample Histological sections of 66 vulvar biopsies.
Methods Six consultant pathologists working at different European instituti
ons independently reviewed 66 vulvar biopsies. The following variables were
investigated: specimen adequacy, gross categorisation into benign or neopl
astic changes, presence of atypical cytological pattern, presence of neopla
stic architectural pattern, grade of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, pres
ence of histopathologic associated findings for human papillomavirus infect
ion.
Main outcome measures The degree of inter-observer variation for each histo
pathologic parameter was assessed by Kappa (kappa) statistics. The frequenc
y and the degree of disagreement were calculated by a symmetrical agreement
matrix showing the number paired classifications.
Results A good agreement (overall weighted kappa = 0.65, unweighted kappa =
0.46) was observed for grading vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Human pap
illomavirus infection associated findings and specimen adequacy were the va
riables with less inter-observer agreement (overall weighted kappa 0.26 and
0.22, respectively). Exact agreement between two pathologists for grade of
vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia was observed in 63.6% of paired readings;
the rate of paired agreement reached 73.9% considering vulvar intraepithel
ial neoplasia 2 and 3 as a single class. Conversely, only 5.0% of vulvar in
traepithelial neoplasia 1 diagnoses were concordant in paired analysis.
Conclusions Current terminology offers a reproducible tool in the hands of
expert pathologists. While on the diagnosis of 'high grade' vulvar intraepi
thelial neoplasia (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3) there is good
agreement, the diagnostic category of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 1 is
not reproducible.