Our findings suggest that there are systematic differences in the ways that
voters use the real values of economic variables when casting a vote depen
ding on how long they have had to learn about the true state of the economy
. It is possible that in campaigns of sufficient length voters may have mor
e time to be exposed to competing campaign messages and to learn about the
true state of the economy and the true policy positions of candidates. We t
ested this assertion on 113 elections in thirteen democracies. The test res
ults in a confirmation of the hypothesis. In longer campaigns, voters rely
more heavily on the true values of economic conditions to inform their eval
uations of parties in power. In shorter campaigns, these effects are mostly
absent. Campaign length seems to matter for voter learning.