Gc. Brown et al., Difference between ophthalmologists' and patients' perceptions of quality of life associated with age-related macular degeneration, CAN J OPHTH, 35(3), 2000, pp. 127-133
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE
Background: There may be a wide disparity between the perceptions of patien
ts and those of their treating physicians concerning the quality of life as
sociated with a given state of health. Because of this potential for differ
ence of opinion, we performed a study to evaluate patients' and ophthalmolo
gists' perceptions of quality of life, as measured by utility analysis, ass
ociated with visual loss secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD
).
Methods: Cross-sectional study. Utilities were assessed, by means of both t
he time trade-off method and the standard gamble method, for various degree
s of theoretical visual loss secondary to AMD for ophthalmologists-in-train
ing and graduate ophthalmologists. These were compared to utilities for a k
nown population of patients with actual visual loss due to AMD. A utility o
f 1.0 is associated with perfect health, whereas a utility of 0.0 is associ
ated with death.
Results: With both the time trade-oft and standard gamble methods, the pati
ents had lower mean utilities than did the ophthalmologists for the same de
grees of visual loss secondary to AMD. The ophthalmologists were significan
tly less willing than the patients to trade years of remaining life for per
fect vision with the time tradeoff method (p less than or equal to 0.01), a
nd with the standard gamble method they were less willing than the patients
to take the risk of dying in return for perfect vision. Given the scenario
of counting fingers or worse vision in both eyes, the ophthalmologists wer
e willing to trade 3.3 of every 10 years of remaining life for perfect visi
on in both eyes, whereas the patients with actual vision of counting finger
s or worse in both eyes were willing to trade 6.0 of every 10 years of rema
ining life for this result.
Interpretation: When presented with the scenario of visual loss secondary t
o AMD, ophthalmologists substantially underestimated its effect on patients
' quality of life.