Collection of buccal cell DNA using treated cards

Citation
Lc. Harty et al., Collection of buccal cell DNA using treated cards, CANC EPID B, 9(5), 2000, pp. 501-506
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
ISSN journal
10559965 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
501 - 506
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-9965(200005)9:5<501:COBCDU>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
We devised a simple, noninvasive, cost-efficient technique for collecting b uccal cell DNA for molecular epidemiology studies. Subjects (n = 52) brushe d their oral mucosa and expectorated the fluid in their mouths, which was a pplied to "Guthrie" cards pretreated to retard bacterial growth and inhibit nuclease activity (IsoCode, Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH). The cards are well-suited for transport and storage because they dry quickly, need no processing, and are compact and lightweight. We stored the samples at room temperature for 5 days to mimic a field situation and then divided them in to portions from which DNA was extracted either immediately or after storag e for 9 months at room temperature, -20 degrees C, or -70 degrees C, The fr esh samples had a median yield of 2.3 mu g of human DNA (range, 0.2-53.8 mu g), which was adequate for at least 550 PCR reactions. More than 90% of th e samples were amplified in all three beta-globin gene fragment assays atte mpted. DNA extract frozen for 1 week at -20 degrees C also performed well. Stored samples had reduced DNA yields, which achieved statistical significa nce for room temperature and -70 degrees C, but not -20 degrees C, storage. However, because all of the stored samples tested were successfully amplif ied, the observed reduction may represent tighter DNA fixation to the card over time rather than loss of genetic material. We conclude that treated ca rds are an alternative to brushes! swabs and mouth rinses for the collectio n of buccal cell DNA and offer some advantages over these methods, particul arly for large-scale or long-term studies involving stored samples and stud ies in which samples are collected off-site and transported. Future studies that enable direct comparisons of the various buccal cell collection metho ds are needed.