Background-Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested an associat
ion between thrombus-related events and type of contrast media, Low osmolar
contrast agents appear to improve the safety of diagnostic and coronary ar
tery interventional procedures. However, no data are available on PTCA outc
omes with an isosmolar contrast agent.
Methods and Results-A multicenter prospective randomized double-blind trial
was performed in 856 high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery interve
ntion. The objective was to compare the isosmolar nonionic dimer iodixanol
(n=405) with the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate (n=410). A composite var
iable of in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACE) was the primary e
nd point. A secondary objective was to evaluate major angiographic and proc
edural events during and after PTCA, The composite in-hospital primary end
point was less frequent in those receiving iodixanol compared with those re
ceiving ioxaglate (5.4% versus 9.5%, respectively; P=0.027), Core laborator
y defined angiographic success was more frequent in patients receiving iodi
xanol (92.2% versus 85.9% fur ioxaglate, P=0.004), There was a trend toward
lower total clinical events at 30 days in patients randomized to iodixanol
(9.1% versus 13.2% for ioxaglate, P=0.07), Multivariate predictors of in-h
ospital MACE were use of ioxaglate (P=0.01) and treatment of a de novo lesi
on (P=0.03),
Conclusions-In this contemporary prospective multicenter trial of PTCA in t
he setting of acute coronary syndromes, there was a low incidence of in-hos
pital clinical events for both treatment groups The cohort receiving the no
nionic dimer iodixanol experienced a 45% reduction in in-hospital MACE when
compared with the cohort receiving ioxaglate.