L. Robertson et al., THE INTERACTION OF SPATIAL AND OBJECT PATHWAYS - EVIDENCE FROM BALINTS-SYNDROME, Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 9(3), 1997, pp. 295-317
An earlier report described a patient (RM) with bilateral parietal dam
age who showed severe binding problems bet tween shape and color and s
hape and size (Friedman-Will, Robertson, & Treisman, 1995). When shown
two different-colored letters, RM reported a large number of illusory
conjunctions (ICs) combining the shape of one letter with the color o
f the other, even when he was looking directly at one of them and had
as long as 10 sec to respond. The lesions also produced severe deficit
s in locating and reaching for objects, and difficulty in seeing more
than one object at a time, resulting in a neuropsychological diagnosis
of Balint's syndrome or dorsal simultanagnosia. The pattern of defici
ts supported predictions of Treisman's Feature integration Theory (FIT
) that the loss of spatial information would lead to binding errors. T
hey further suggested that the spatial information used in binding dep
ends on intact parietal function. In the present paper we extend these
findings and examine other deficits in RM that would be predicted by
FIT. We show that: (1) Object individuation is impaired, making it imp
ossible for him correctly to count more than one or two objects, even
when he is aware that more are present. (2) Visual search for a target
defined by a conjunction of features (requiring binding) is impaired,
while the detection of a target defined by a unique feature is not. S
earch for the absence of a feature (O among Qs) Is also severely impai
red, while search for the presence (Q among Os) is not. Feature absenc
e can only be detected when all the present features are bound to the
nontarget items. (3) RM's deficits cannot be attributed to a general b
inding problem: binding errors were far more likely with simultaneous
presentation where spatial information was required than with sequenti
al presentation where time could be used as the medium for binding. (4
) Selection for attention was severely impaired, whether it was based
on the position of a marker or on some other feature (color). (5) Spat
ial information seems to exist that RM cannot access, suggesting that
feature binding relies on a relatively late stage where implicit spati
al information is made explicitly accessible. The data converge to sup
port our conclusions that explicit spatial knowledge is necessary for
the perception of accurately bound features, for accurate attentional
selection, and for accurate and rapid search for a conjunction of feat
ures in a multiitem display. It is obviously necessary for directing a
ttention to spatial locations, but the consequences of impairments in
this ability seem also to affect object selection, object individuatio
n, and feature integration. Thus, the functional effects of parietal d
amage are not limited to the spatial and attentional problems that hav
e long been described in patients with Balint's syndrome. Damage to pa
rietal areas also affects object perception through damage to spatial
representations that are fundamental for spatial awareness.