Al. Bruu et al., Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies, CL DIAG LAB, 7(3), 2000, pp. 451-456
Ten microbiological departments in Norway have participated in a multicente
r evaluation of the following commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Bar
r virus (EBV)-specific and heterophile antibodies: CAPTIA Select viral caps
id antigen (VCA)-M/G/EBNA (Centocor Inc.), Enzygnost anti-EBV/immunoglobuli
n M (IgM) and IgG (Dade Behring), Vironostika EBV VCA IgM/IgG/EBNA enzyme-l
inked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Organon Teknika), SEROFLUOR immunofluore
scence assay acid EBV Combi-Test (Institute Virion Ltd.), anti-EBV recombin
ant IgM- and IgG-early antigen/EBNA IgG ELISA (Biotest Diagnostics), EBV Ig
M/IgG/EBNA ELISA (Cull Laboratories), Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn test (Sanofi D
iagnostics Pasteur), Monosticon Dri-Dot (Organon Teknika), Avitex-IM (Omega
Diagnostics Ltd.), Alexon Serascan infectious mononucleosis test (Alexon B
iomedical me.), Clearview IM (Unipath Ltd.), and Cards+/-OS Mono (Pacific B
iotech, Inc.). The test panel included sera from patients with primary EBV
infection, immunocompromised patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection
, healthy persons (blood donors), and EBV-seronegative persons. Among the t
ests for EBV-specific antibodies the sensitivity was good, with only small
differences between the different assays. However, there was a greater vari
ation in specificity, which varied between 100% (Enzygnost) and 86% (Biotes
t), Tests for detection of heterophile antibodies based on purified or sele
cted antigen (Avitex, Alexon, Clearview IM, and Cards+/-OS Mono) were more
sensitive than the Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn and Monosticon tests.