Background Sirolimus is a novel macrocyclic antibiotic that has an immunosu
ppressive mechanism of action distinct from that of cyclosporine and tacrol
imus.
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide an overview of the cl
inical development of sirolimus with emphasis on the mechanism of immunosup
pressive activity, prevention of acute renal allograft rejection, clinical
pharmacokinetics, concentration-effect relationships, and therapeutic drug
monitoring (TDM).
Results: Pharmacokinetic studies in adult renal transplant patients have sh
own that sirolimus may be characterized as a drug with rapid absorption (t(
max) = 1 to 2 hours), low systemic availability (F = 14%), linear dose prop
ortionality (2 to 24 mg), extensive partitioning into formed blood elements
(B/P = 36), large apparent volume of distribution (1.7 L/kg), prolonged te
rminal half-life (62 hours), and large intersubject (CV = 52%) and intrasub
ject (CV = 26%) variability in oral-dose clearance. Results from phase III
pivotal trials showed that sirolimus (2 or 5 mg/d) reduced acute renal graf
t rejection (generally, P < 0.01) without TDM. Although TDM may not be requ
ired for a regimen consisting of full-dose cyclosporine and corticosteroids
with sirolimus 2 mg/d (4 hours after cyclosporine), it may be warranted in
patients (1) with hepatic impairment, (2) who are young children, (3) who
are receiving concurrent doses of strong CYP3A/p-glycoprotein inhibitors or
inducers, (4) in whom cyclosporine dosing is markedly reduced or discontin
ued, and (5) who are at a high risk for rejection. A whole-blood sirolimus
therapeutic window of 5 to 15 ng/mL (measured by microparticle enzyme immun
oassay) is recommended for patients at standard risk of rejection. The larg
e intrapatient variability observed in trough sirolimus concentrations indi
cates that dose adjustments should be optimally based on mon than a single
trough sample. Because of the time required to reach steady state, sirolimu
s dose adjustments would optimally be based on trough levels obtained great
er than or equal to 5 to 7 days after a dose change.
Conclusions: The effective use of sirolimus in an immunosuppressive regimen
for the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection requires an understa
nding of the drug's clinical pharmacokinetics, concentration/adverse-effect
relationship, concentration-efficacy relationship, and TDM.