Vaginal epithelial surface appearances in women using vaginal rings for contraception

Citation
Is. Fraser et al., Vaginal epithelial surface appearances in women using vaginal rings for contraception, CONTRACEPT, 61(2), 2000, pp. 131-138
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CONTRACEPTION
ISSN journal
00107824 → ACNP
Volume
61
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
131 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-7824(200002)61:2<131:VESAIW>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Vaginal inspections using colposcopy before insertion of contraceptive vagi nal rings and at e-month intervals during ring use were conducted on 169 us ers of four different formulations. The rings studied released Nestorone(R) alone (50, 75, 100 mu g daily over 6 months); ethinyl estradiol: Nestorone (30:200 and 25:150 mu g daily over 6 months); ethinylestradiol:norethindro ne acetate (20:1000 and 25: 1000 mu g daily over 4 months); and ethinyl est radiol:norethindrone acetate (20:1000 mu g daily over 22 months). A total O f 88 altered or atypical conditions of the vaginal surface appearance were recorded in 507 inspections (17.4% of inspections). Many of these atypical appearances were quite subtle. The incidence was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than in the single pretreatment examinations (11 in 158 inspections; 7.0%), but closely matched that of a "control group" of sexually active wom en who were the subject of an earlier study by the same investigators. In t hat study, the incidence was 18% (57 atypical conditions in 327 inspections ). In all, 83% of atypical conditions identified in the vagina during ring use had disappeared by the next scheduled colposcopy despite continued ring use. Findings of potential significance were conservatively defined as all ulcerations, those abrasions and ecchymoses that were >0.5 cm in any direc tion, and fields of five or more petechiae. Findings fitting those criteria comprised 30% of atypical conditions in ring users, 33% in the control gro up, and 27% pretreatment. The corresponding incidence as a percentage of in spections were 5.3%, 6.0%, and 2.5% in the ring users, control groups, and pretreatment groups, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that the vaginal rings included in the s tudies contributed little, if at all, so clinically significant lesions or to total lesion incidence. Further definition would require a larger and lo nger-term study with matched controls. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All r ights reserved.