The paper examines the efficiency and applicability of various economic con
cepts dealing with environmental uncertainty. Their applicability is analys
ed by classifying environmental uncertainty according to different criteria
. Using such a structure, it can be shown that while the economic concepts
are able to deal satisfactorily with some types of environmental uncertaint
y they are unable to deal with others adequately. The analysis of efficienc
y distinguishes between environmental risk (in which the decision-maker is
aware of the distribution function of the random variables) and ignorance (
in which the decision-maker does not know the relevant distribution functio
ns). The concept of a risk premium proposed by Siebert, the policy recommen
dation to promote integrated technologies, and the environmental assurance
bonding system developed by Costanza and Perrings are examined in terms of
efficiency and applicability. The analysis reveals the following: (i) the a
pplication possibilities of the three concepts differ significantly; (ii) a
concept which concentrates on the reduction of risk may lead to an increas
e in ignorance; (iii) while an economic concept may be efficient in the con
text of risk, it can be inefficient when ignorance exists; (iv) a trade-off
exists between the possibility to precisely state whether an economic conc
ept is efficient and the scope of its applicability. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scie
nce B.V. All rights reserved.