Clinical impact of dosimetry quality assurance programmes assessed by radiobiological modelling of data from the thermoluminescent dosimetry study ofthe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
Sm. Bentzen et al., Clinical impact of dosimetry quality assurance programmes assessed by radiobiological modelling of data from the thermoluminescent dosimetry study ofthe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EUR J CANC, 36(5), 2000, pp. 615-620
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Radi
otherapy Group initiated its mailed thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) prog
ramme in 1986. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical re
levance of variations in beam output detected in the period 1993 to 1996. A
total of 140 beam outputs were checked (26 for cobalt-60 units and 114 for
linear accelerators) in 35 centres. Clinical dose-response data for tumour
control and normal tissue morbidity were used to assess the variation in c
linical outcome resulting from variability in beam output. For 75 checked b
eams with nominal accelerating potentials (n.a.p.) of 6 MV or less the mean
ratio, +/- standard deviation (S.D.) of measured to stated output was 1.00
4 +/- 0.020. For 65 beams with n.a.p. of 8 MV or more, the ratio was 1.009
+/- 0.021. Even with this relatively high level of precision, broad distrib
utions of estimated tumour control or normal tissue morbidity were found. I
n the 10% of the beams with the most pronounced underdosage, the loss in tu
mour control probability was estimated at 7-8 percentage points. Likewise,
in the 10% of the beams with the most pronounced overdosage, the increase i
n mild/moderate morbidity was 19-22 percentage points. For severe morbidity
the same beams raised the estimated incidence of severe complications from
5% to 9-10%. An estimation of the loss of uncomplicated cure probability w
as about 1% for both high and low energy beams. Sequential mailings conside
rably improved the uniformity of clinical outcome. We conclude that small d
eviations in beam output may lead to clinically important variations in out
come. Substantial reductions in the variation between measured and stated o
utput can be achieved by sequential mailings. Mailed TLD checks should be a
n integral part of a continuously ongoing quality assurance activity in rad
iotherapy. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.