Objectives: This study evaluated the electrocardiogram (EKG) reading skills
of family practice residents. Methods: A multicenter study was carried out
to evaluate the accuracy of EKG reading in the family practice setting. Ba
sed on the frequency and potential for clinical significance, we chose 18 c
ommon findings on 10 EKGs for evaluation. The EKGs were then distributed to
residents at six family practice residencies. Residents were given one poi
nt for the identification of each correct EKG finding and scored based on t
he number correct over a total of 18. Results: Sixty-one residents (20 firs
t year 23 second year; and 18 third year) completed readings for 10 EKGs an
d were evaluated for their ability to identify 18 EKG findings. The median
score out of 18 possible points for all first-, second-, and third-year res
idents was 12, 12, and 11.5, respectively. Twenty-one percent of residents
did nor correctly identify a tracing of an acute myocardial infarction. Dat
a analysis showed no statistically significant difference among the three g
roups of residents. Conclusions: We evaluated the accuracy of EKG reading s
kills of family practice residents at each year of training. This study sug
gests that EKG reading skills do not improve during residency, and further
study of curricular change to improve these skills should be considered.