Mutagenic analysis of Thr-232 in rhodanese from Azotobacter vinelandii highlighted the differences of this prokaryotic enzyme from the known sulfurtransferases
S. Pagani et al., Mutagenic analysis of Thr-232 in rhodanese from Azotobacter vinelandii highlighted the differences of this prokaryotic enzyme from the known sulfurtransferases, FEBS LETTER, 472(2-3), 2000, pp. 307-311
Azotobacter vinclandii RhdA uses thiosulfate? as the only sulfur donor in v
itro, and this apparent selectivity seems to be a unique property among the
characterized sulfurtransferases. To investigate the basis of substrate re
cognition in RhdA, we replaced Thr-232 with tither hla or Lys. Thr-232 was
the target of this study since the corresponding Lys-249 in bovine rhodanes
e has been identified as necessary for catalytic sulfur transfer, and repla
cement of Lys-249 with Ala fully inactivates bovine rhodanese, Both T232K a
nd T232A mutants of RhdA shelved significant increase in thiosulfate-cyanid
e sulfurtransferase activity, and no detectable activity in the presence of
3-mercaptopyruvate as the sulfur donor substrate. Fluorescence measurement
s showed that wild-type and mutant RhdAs tt cre overexpressed in the persul
furated form, thus conferring to this enzyme the potential of a persulfide
sulfur donor compound. RhdA contains a unique sequence stretch around the c
atalytic cysteine, and the data here presented suggest a possible divergent
physiological function of A. vinelandii sulfurtransferase, (C) 2000 Federa
tion of European Biochemical Societies.