Usefulness of Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion

Citation
Je. Pena et al., Usefulness of Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion, FERT STERIL, 73(5), 2000, pp. 1047-1050
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1047 - 1050
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200005)73:5<1047:UODSIT>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the predictive value of Doppler sonography in the diag nosis of ovarian torsion and to correlate Doppler results with surgical fin dings and various clinical characteristics. Design: Retrospective study of discharged inpatients. Setting: An academic community hospital. Patient(s): Twenty-one patients with surgically confirmed ovarian torsion o ver an 8-year period. Intervention(s): Data were collected on Doppler flow results, ultrasound an d surgical findings, patient characteristics, and associated morbidity. Main Outcome Measure(s): Accuracy of Doppler diagnosis as to presence of ov arian torsion. Result(s): Twenty-one patients had surgically confirmed ovarian torsion. Do ppler sonography was performed in 10 of the 21 patients. Doppler sonographi c findings were normal in 60% (6 of 10), and abnormal (decreased or absent) in 40% suggestive of torsion. In cases involving ovulation induction, Dopp ler sonography findings were normal in 25% (1 of 4). Furthermore, the time to diagnosis of ovarian torsion (mean = 5.3 hours) and the time to hospital discharge (mean = 2 days) were both decreased when compared with instances when normal flow was detected by Doppler sonography (59 hours and 2.7 days , respectively). Conclusion(s): Abnormal flow detected by Doppler sonography is highly predi ctive of adnexal torsion and is therefore useful in the diagnosis of ovaria n torsion. However, when normal flow is detected by Doppler sonography, it does not necessarily exclude an ovarian torsion; in fact, torsion is missed in 60% of cases, and time to diagnosis in these cases is delayed. In cases of ovulation induction, sensitivity is increased to 75%. (Fertil Steril(R) 2000;73:1047-50. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine).