Anorexia: A "losing" strategy?

Authors
Citation
L. Mealey, Anorexia: A "losing" strategy?, HUM NATURE, 11(1), 2000, pp. 105-116
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE
ISSN journal
10456767 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
105 - 116
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-6767(2000)11:1<105:AA"S>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Several theorists have tried to model anorexia on Wasser and Barash's (1983 ) "reproductive suppression model" (RSM). According to the RSM, individual females adaptively suppress their reproductive functioning under conditions of social or physiological stress. From this perspective, mild anorexia is viewed as an adaptive response to modem conditions; more severe anorexia i s viewed as an adaptation gone awry. Previous models have not, however, exa mined the full richness of the RSM. Specifically, Wasser and Barash documen ted not only self-imposed reproductive suppression, but also manipulative r eproductive suppression of subordinate females by dominants. I propose that the modem "epidemic" of anorexia is explained neither by adaptive self-sup pression nor by environmental mismatch (an adaptation gone awry); I propose that the "epidemic" levels of anorexia seen in modern western society are a direct consequence of intrasexual competition, the scope of which has bee n enhanced by the power and reach of modem communications media. According to this perspective, anorexia, even in its mild forms, is a manipulative st rategy imposed on subordinates by dominants. Anorexia is, in both senses, a "losing" strategy.