Testing the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents is fundament
al to the study of resistance. The qualitative methods that were originally
devised evolved separately in different countries and as the need for more
precise quantitative information became clear, different solutions to the
problem emerged. Consequently. the methods now recommended vary widely betw
een countries acid achieving a consensus on standardisation has proved diff
icult. Sensitivity testing serves two purposes to provide meaningful result
s to the prescriber and to monitor changes in susceptibility of microbial p
opulations. The diagnostic purpose is adequately served by the diversity of
methods used, provided they are performed and controlled efficiently. High
ly standardised methods are however needed for surveillance in the national
and international context and to provide meaningful comparisons to be made
between individual centres. These needs are best met by the use of agreed
methods and interpretative criteria in sentinel laboratories. No sensitivit
y test method can provide the 'correct' answer all the time, if only becaus
e the 'correct' answer in therapeutic terms is wt known with ally certainty
. Laboratories providing a sensitivity testing service can influence prescr
ibing and hence the development of resistance - in a number of different wa
ys and the quest for standardisation at all costs should not obscure these
important functions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. and International Socie
ty of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.