1. An explicitly spatial sampling approach was employed to test the null hy
pothesis that the predation on slugs by the carabid beetle Pterostichus mel
anarius (Illiger) was opportunistic.
2. The beetles and slugs were sampled across a nested series of grids of sa
mpling points, in a field of winter wheat during June and July 1997.
3. The spatial distribution of all slugs in June was found to change with t
he scale of the sampling grid, from random on the 0.25 m scale, through agg
regation at 1 m, to random at 4 m. At the highest scale of 16 m, the slugs
were significantly spatially aggregated.
4. The distribution of beetles in June was also spatially dynamic, with ran
domness observed at the 4 m and 8 m scales. At 16 m, significant aggregatio
n was observed.
5. The dynamic distributions of slugs and beetles, at 16 m, were found not
to be associated with, and thus were not determined by, soil or crop factor
s.
6. Comparison of slug and beetle populations showed, however, that the dist
ributions at 16 m were dynamically associated with each other. In June wher
e there were many slugs there were also many carabids, whilst in July where
there were many carabids there were few slugs.
7. Approximately 11% of the beetles sampled across the 16 m grid in June an
d July were found to have ingested slug protein, following intensive enzyme
-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing.
8. The spatial distribution of these slug-positive beetles was significantl
y associated with the distribution of the larger slug classes, over 25 mg.
Where there were many large slugs in June there were many slug-positive bee
tles. Conversely, in July few large slugs were found where there were many
slug-positive beetles.
9. Parametric analysis revealed that these changes in the large slug class,
at each sampling point between June and July (growth), were negatively rel
ated to the local numbers of slug-positive beetles, and that growth decline
d as the local numbers of beetles increased.
10. These findings suggest that predation was not opportunistic, but direct
and dynamic, falsifying the null hypothesis. Moreover, this predation elic
ited significant changes in the spatial distribution and local density of t
he slugs, in a manner that may be termed spatially density dependent.