Spatial dynamics of predation by carabid beetles on slugs

Citation
Da. Bohan et al., Spatial dynamics of predation by carabid beetles on slugs, J ANIM ECOL, 69(3), 2000, pp. 367-379
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00218790 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
367 - 379
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8790(200005)69:3<367:SDOPBC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
1. An explicitly spatial sampling approach was employed to test the null hy pothesis that the predation on slugs by the carabid beetle Pterostichus mel anarius (Illiger) was opportunistic. 2. The beetles and slugs were sampled across a nested series of grids of sa mpling points, in a field of winter wheat during June and July 1997. 3. The spatial distribution of all slugs in June was found to change with t he scale of the sampling grid, from random on the 0.25 m scale, through agg regation at 1 m, to random at 4 m. At the highest scale of 16 m, the slugs were significantly spatially aggregated. 4. The distribution of beetles in June was also spatially dynamic, with ran domness observed at the 4 m and 8 m scales. At 16 m, significant aggregatio n was observed. 5. The dynamic distributions of slugs and beetles, at 16 m, were found not to be associated with, and thus were not determined by, soil or crop factor s. 6. Comparison of slug and beetle populations showed, however, that the dist ributions at 16 m were dynamically associated with each other. In June wher e there were many slugs there were also many carabids, whilst in July where there were many carabids there were few slugs. 7. Approximately 11% of the beetles sampled across the 16 m grid in June an d July were found to have ingested slug protein, following intensive enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing. 8. The spatial distribution of these slug-positive beetles was significantl y associated with the distribution of the larger slug classes, over 25 mg. Where there were many large slugs in June there were many slug-positive bee tles. Conversely, in July few large slugs were found where there were many slug-positive beetles. 9. Parametric analysis revealed that these changes in the large slug class, at each sampling point between June and July (growth), were negatively rel ated to the local numbers of slug-positive beetles, and that growth decline d as the local numbers of beetles increased. 10. These findings suggest that predation was not opportunistic, but direct and dynamic, falsifying the null hypothesis. Moreover, this predation elic ited significant changes in the spatial distribution and local density of t he slugs, in a manner that may be termed spatially density dependent.