Objective. The Verbal Numerical Scale (VNS) for rating pain is bounded betw
een 0 (= no pain) and 10 (= worst pain imaginable). We hypothesized that th
e limitations inherent to this boundary when rating extremely painful stimu
li may be identified by integrating the VNS with an unbounded score such as
magnitude estimation of relative change. Methods.Volunteers received stimu
li of increasing current via cutaneous electrodes until they rated > 5 on t
he VNS scale. This stimulus, termed S, was arbitrarily assigned a magnitude
estimate of 100%. Then, stimuli of varying currents were delivered; two we
re 10 mA and 20 mA higher than S (S+10 and S+20), two were 1/2 of the curre
nt for the S stimulus (S-1/2), and one was at the original current (S-repea
t). The pain elicited by each stimulus was scored in proportion to the S st
imulus. The extrapolated VNS score (VNSext) was determined by multiplying t
his magnitude estimate (%) by the VNS score for S. Main Results. Seventy pe
rcent of the stimuli with higher intensity than S generated a VNSext score
above 10. The mean magnitude estimations for S+10 and S+20 were 186% and 24
2%: they generated mean (median) VNS(e)xt values of 12.4 [12] and 16.2 [14]
, respectively (p = 0.019 for the difference between them by Wilcoxon signe
d rank test). Conclusions. The combined use of VNS and magnitude estimation
confirmed that the ceiling of the bounded pain scale may significantly lim
it a patient's ability to describe a new pain stimulus. VNSext may provide
a means of overcoming this limitation.