Objectives: To investigate the use of computerised image analysis to measur
e the area of demineralisation on the buccal surface of a tooth and to anal
yse the effect on that measurement of varying the angle at which a photogra
phic image of the buccal surface of a tooth is taken.
Methods: Twenty-two teeth with areas of incremental demineralisation on the
buccal surface were photographed perpendicular to the buccal surface and a
t angles of 20 and 40 degrees, above (Cuspal) and below (Gingival) the perp
endicular. The images were captured and analysed using computerised image a
nalysis.
Results: The Gingival views showed lower limits of agreement than the Cuspa
l views, probably due to the positioning of the masking on the lower part o
f the flash, to reduce reflection. There was a significant difference betwe
en the areas of demineralisation measured for the three angles from the Gin
gival views (p < 0.001). The mean differences in areas measured were not li
near, but there was a significantly greater reduction in area measured for
the 40 degrees views.
Conclusions: Computerised image analysis to measure areas of demineralisati
on from a captured 35 mm slide is reproducible. The position of the masking
on the camera flash and the angle of the camera makes a difference to the
area measured and the grey scales recorded. Images taken at a larger angle
than 20 degrees to the perpendicular will record a significantly reduced ar
ea of demineralisation. Standardisation of photographs with the use of cali
bration markers and manipulation of images is discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.