OBJECTIVES: To examine the ability of activity of daily living (ADL)-impair
ed older adults to successfully rise, and, when successful, the time taken
to rise, from a bed and chair under varying rise task demands.
SETTING: Seven congregate housing facilities
SUBJECTS: Congregate housing residents (n = 116, mean age 82) who admitted
to requiring assistance (such as from a person, equipment, or device) in pe
rforming at least one of the following mobility-related ADLs: transferring,
walking, bathing, and toileting.
METHODS: Subjects performed a series of bed and chair rise tasks where the
rise task demand varied according to the head of bed (HOB) height, chair se
at height, and use of hands. Bed rise tasks included supine to sit-to-edge,
sit up in bed with hand use, and sit up in bed without hands, all performe
d from a bed where the HOB was adjusted to 0, 30, and 45 degrees elevations
; roll to side-lying then rise (HOB 0 degrees); and supine to stand (HOB 0
degrees). Chair seat heights were adjusted according to the percent of the
distance between the floor and the knee (% FK), and included rises (1) with
hands and then without hands at 140, 120, 100, and 80% FK; (2) from a recl
ining (105 degrees at chair back) and tilting (seat tilted 10 degrees poste
riorly) chair (100% FK); and (3) from a 80% FK seat height with a 4-inch cu
shion added, with and then without hands. Logistic regression for repeated
measures was used to test for differences between tasks in the ability to r
ise. After log transformation of rise time, a linear effects model was used
to compare rise time between tasks.
RESULTS: The median total number of tasks successfully completed was 18 (ra
nge, 3-21). Nearly all subjects were able to rise from positions where the
starting surface was elevated as long as hand use was unlimited. With the H
OB at 30 or 45 degrees essentially all subjects could complete supine to si
t-to-edge and sit up with hands. Essentially all subjects could rise from a
seat height at 140, 120, and 100% FK as long as hand use was allowed. A sm
all group (8-10%) of subjects was dependent upon hand use to perform the le
ast challenging tasks, such as 140% FK without hands chair rise and 45 degr
ees sit up without hands. This dependency upon hand use increased significa
ntly as the demand of the task increased, that is, as the HOB or seat heigh
t was lowered. Approximately three-quarters of the sample could not rise fr
om a flat(0 degrees HOB elevation) bed or low (80% FI() chair when hand use
was not allowed. Similar trends were seen in rise performance time, that i
s, performance times tended to increase as the HOB or chair seat elevation
declined and as hand use was limited. Total self-reported ADL disability, c
ompared to the single ADL transferring item, was a stronger predictor of ri
se ability and timed rise performance, particularly for chair rise tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: Lowering HOB height and seat height increased bed and chair ri
se task difficulty, particularly when hand use was restricted. Restricting
hand use in low HOB height or lowered seat height conditions may help to id
entify older adults with declining rise ability. Yet, many of those who cou
ld not rise under "without hands" conditions could rise under "with hands"
conditions, suggesting that dependency on hand use may be a marker of progr
essive rise impairment but may not predict day-to-day natural milieu rise p
erformance. Intertask differences in performance time may be statistically
significant but are clinically small. Given the relationship between self-r
eported ADL disability and rise performance, impaired rise performance may
be considered a marker for ADL disability. These bed and chair rise tasks c
an serve as outcomes for an intervention to improve bed and chair rise abil
ity and might also be used in future studies to quantify improvements or de
clines in function over time, to refine physical therapy protocols, and to
examine the effect of bed and chair design modifications on bed and chair r
ise ability.