How common is housing discrimination? Improving on traditional measures

Citation
J. Ondrich et al., How common is housing discrimination? Improving on traditional measures, J URBAN EC, 47(3), 2000, pp. 470-500
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS
ISSN journal
00941190 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
470 - 500
Database
ISI
SICI code
0094-1190(200005)47:3<470:HCIHDI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Fair housing audits are an important tool for measuring the incidence of ra cial and ethnic discrimination in housing markets. Traditional measures of incidence calculate the proportion of cases in which the white auditor is f avored (gross adverse treatment) or the difference between the proportion o f white-favored and minority-favored audits (net adverse treatment). The gr oss measure may overstate discrimination because treatment differences some times arise from differences in circumstances across auditor visits. On the other hand, the net measure under-states discrimination because audits in which the minority auditor is favored for systematic reasons are incorrectl y subtracted. This paper presents a model of agent behavior that more fully accounts for the audit design and employs the estimated parameters to calc ulate bounds on the incidence of discrimination. This approach leads to a l ower bound for the incidence of discrimination that is often substantially higher than the simple net measure and to an upper bound that is close to a nd sometimes above the simple gross measure. (C) 2000 Academic Press.