Bl. Jaber et al., Impact of dialyzer membrane selection on cellular responses in acute renalfailure: A crossover study, KIDNEY INT, 57(5), 2000, pp. 2107-2116
Background. When acute renal failure (ARF) is severe enough to require dial
ysis, in-hospital mortality rates approach 60%. These alarming figures have
been ascribed in part to advanced age and the high prevalence of comorbid
conditions. In the past several years, a number of attempts have been made
to investigate the impact of dialyzer membrane type on clinical outcomes. U
nfortunately, to date, clinical studies addressing this question have repor
ted conflicting results.
Methods. This crossover study examined the effect of dialyzer membrane type
on cytokine synthesis by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), super
oxide release by neutrophils. and apoptosis or programmed cell death of neu
trophils in 24 patients with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis. The p
atients were assigned in an alternate order to a low-flux cellulose acetate
(CA) or polysulfone (PS) dialyzer. After three consecutive dialysis sessio
ns, patients were crossed over to the second dialyzer for three additional
treatments. These cellular responses were measured upon dialyzer assignment
and at the third and sixth dialysis session in relationship to the dialyze
r type.
Results. The results of the study showed no impact of dialyzer biocompatibi
lity on synthesis of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) or interleukin 10 (IL-
10) by PBMCs, superoxide release by neutrophils, or neutrophil apoptosis. T
his held true regardless of the initial dialyzer assignment. Furthermore, t
here was no correlation between dialysis adequacy (measured by single-pool
Kt/V) and postdialysis cellular responses.
Conclusions. In summary, this study refines the question of biocompatibilit
y by comparing a substituted cellulose rather than unsubstituted cellulose
dialyzer to a PS dialyzer in the setting of ARF. The results failed to demo
nstrate a dialyzer advantage on the selected cellular responses.