N. Garg et al., Adsorption profiles of chelating aromatic dithiols and disulfides: Comparison to those of normal alkanethiols and disulfides, LANGMUIR, 16(9), 2000, pp. 4266-4271
This study provides a comparison of the rates of adsorption of the followin
g thiols onto the surface of gold: 1,2-bis(mercaptomethyl)-4,5-dihexadecylb
enzene (1), 1-mercaptomethyl-3,4-dihexadecyl-benzene (2), hexadecanethiol (
4a), and and eicosanethiol (4b). This study also compares the rates of adso
rption of these adsorbates to those obtained for the aromatic disulfide ana
logue of 1 (2,3-dithia-6,7-dihexadecyltetralin, 3) and the normal dialkyl d
isulfide analogues of 4a and 4b (hexadecyl disulfide, 5a, and eicosyl disul
fide, 5b, respectively). The adsorption behavior was monitored using ex sit
u ellipsometry and polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption s
pectroscopy (PM-IRRAS). The adsorption profiles suggest that monolayer form
ation proceeds via two distinct kinetic regimes: (1) a fast initial adsorpt
ion, where ca. 80-90% of the monolayer forms during the first few minutes o
f immersion, followed by (2) a slower orientational ordering lasting severa
l hours. Comparison of the rates of adsorption of the aromatic dithiols 1 t
o those of aromatic monothiol 2 and normal alkanethiols 4a and 4b reveals t
hat the structure of the adsorbate plays a substantial role during the init
ial stages of thiol adsorption. The impact of structural and/or chemical Va
riations is further illustrated by comparing the poor quality of the monola
yer generated from the aromatic disulfide 3 to those of monolayers generate
d from 1, 2, 4, and 5.