We evaluated the validity of Gray's and Fowles' three-arousal model in two
studies of criminal offenders using a continuous motor task involving rewar
ds and punishments. Consistent with predictions for the behavioral approach
/activation system (BAS), offenders displayed significant (p < 0.00001) inc
reases in response time and heart rate (I-IR) from a no-incentive practice
phase to a reward-only (experiment I) and active-avoidance (experiment 2) p
hase. Trait impulsivity was correlated with the response time index of BAS
activation ill experiment 1 but not experiment 2. Consistent with predictio
ns for the behavioral inhibition system (BIS), offenders showed a significa
nt increase in number of skin conductance responses (SCRs) (p < 0.05) from
a reward-only to a mixed-incentive phase in experiment I and a significant
increase in SC amplitude to punishment cues in both experiments. Consistent
with predictions for the dynamics of the model, participants showed signif
icant slowing of response time (p < 0.0001) from reward-only (experiment I)
or active avoidance (experiment 2) to mixed-incentive phases despite showi
ng an initial tendency toward response facilitation to the onset of the pun
ishment cue signifying the beginning of the mixed-incentive phases. Partici
pants also showed significant (p < 0.002) decreases in HR between these pha
ses in both studies, but this effect was only evident on trial I, The BIS-i
nfluenced response time and HR indices were significantly (p < 0.05) correl
ated with anxiety in experiment 1, but unexpectedly, anxiety was not correl
ated with SC indices of the BIS in either study, Although much of the data
support the validity of the Gray/Fowles model, particular findings suggest
that further refinement of this theory is indicated, (C) 2000 Elsevier Scie
nce Ltd. All rights reserved.