Background and Purpose. Ultrasound is often recommended in the treatment of
people with partial and full-thickness wounds. Many treatments are perform
ed over a hydrogel sheet or semipermeable film dressing. The purpose of thi
s in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of 4 hydrogels (Nu-Gel, C
learSite, Aquasorb Border, and CarraDres) and 4 film dressings (CarraSmart
Film, J&J Bioclusive, Tegaderm, and Opsite Flexigrid) in ultrasound transmi
ssion. Methods. The amount of sound energy transmitted through each product
and interposed pig tissue was measured using an oscilloscope to display th
e intensity of sound energy delivered by the transducer. Five intensities a
t a frequency of 3.3 MHz were studied. Results. Results were expressed as t
he mean (+/-SD) percentage of voltage transmitted compared with a gel basel
ine. Nu-Gel was the most efficient hydrogel (77.2%+/-4.6%), followed by Cle
arSite (72.0%+/-2.2%), Aquasorb Border (45.3%+/-2.1%),and CarraDres (42.8%/-5.9%). The 4 film dressings, in order of efficiency, were CarraSmart Film
(60.5%+/-4.4%), J&J Bioclusive (53.2%+/-2.4%), Tegaderm (47.1%+/-2.3%), an
d Opsite Flexigrid (31.5%+/-4.0%). Conclusion and Discussion, Transmissivit
y of wound care products used to deliver acoustic energy during ultrasound
treatment of wounds varies greatly among dressing products. We believe that
clinicians can use our findings as a part of the clinical reasoning proces
s that they use to select an optimal wound dressing.