Effectiveness of wound care products in the transmission of acoustic energy

Citation
B. Klucinec et al., Effectiveness of wound care products in the transmission of acoustic energy, PHYS THER, 80(5), 2000, pp. 469-476
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISSN journal
00319023 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
469 - 476
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9023(200005)80:5<469:EOWCPI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background and Purpose. Ultrasound is often recommended in the treatment of people with partial and full-thickness wounds. Many treatments are perform ed over a hydrogel sheet or semipermeable film dressing. The purpose of thi s in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of 4 hydrogels (Nu-Gel, C learSite, Aquasorb Border, and CarraDres) and 4 film dressings (CarraSmart Film, J&J Bioclusive, Tegaderm, and Opsite Flexigrid) in ultrasound transmi ssion. Methods. The amount of sound energy transmitted through each product and interposed pig tissue was measured using an oscilloscope to display th e intensity of sound energy delivered by the transducer. Five intensities a t a frequency of 3.3 MHz were studied. Results. Results were expressed as t he mean (+/-SD) percentage of voltage transmitted compared with a gel basel ine. Nu-Gel was the most efficient hydrogel (77.2%+/-4.6%), followed by Cle arSite (72.0%+/-2.2%), Aquasorb Border (45.3%+/-2.1%),and CarraDres (42.8%/-5.9%). The 4 film dressings, in order of efficiency, were CarraSmart Film (60.5%+/-4.4%), J&J Bioclusive (53.2%+/-2.4%), Tegaderm (47.1%+/-2.3%), an d Opsite Flexigrid (31.5%+/-4.0%). Conclusion and Discussion, Transmissivit y of wound care products used to deliver acoustic energy during ultrasound treatment of wounds varies greatly among dressing products. We believe that clinicians can use our findings as a part of the clinical reasoning proces s that they use to select an optimal wound dressing.