Effect of surface treatment of glass fibres on adhesion to polypropylene resin

Citation
S. Chou et al., Effect of surface treatment of glass fibres on adhesion to polypropylene resin, POLYM POL C, 8(2), 2000, pp. 131-138
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
POLYMERS & POLYMER COMPOSITES
ISSN journal
09673911 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
131 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
0967-3911(2000)8:2<131:EOSTOG>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
This study concerns the treatment of glass fibres to improve their adhesion to polypropylene resin (PP). The glass fibres were treated with four types of coupling agents and then with maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (M APP) emulsion. The surface characteristics and bond strength were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XP S), and a microbonding pull-out test. The mechanical properties of the comp osites were tested. Because the two ends of the coupling agent molecules reacted with the glass fibre surface and the MAPP emulsion respectively to form chemical bonds, a nd the MAPP emulsion possesses good compatibility with polypropylene, an in terphase was formed while melt blending, which improved the glass fibre/pol ypropylene bonding. This could be proved by using a microbonding pull-out t est. The composites of glass fibre and PP were fabricated by means of a twi n screwy extruder and an injection moulding machine. The tensile strength a nd flexural strength were measured and the fracture surfaces were observed by SEM to assess the contribution of the surface treatment. The test results demonstrate that the tensile strength of those composites reinforced by glass fibres treated with coupling agent and MAPP emulsion wa s 38% higher than that of the composites reinforced by untreated glass fibr es, and 21% higher than that of composites that used the coupling agent alo ne. As for the flexural strength, the coupling agent/MAPP emulsion treatmen t was 44% better than having no treatment and 25% better than using the cou pling agent alone.