Jh. Porter et al., Clozapine discrimination with a low training dose distinguishes atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs in rats, PSYCHOPHAR, 149(2), 2000, pp. 189-193
Rationale: Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not rel
iably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics. Objectives
. The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine d
rug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics.
Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicl
e in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. Results: Generalization tes
ting revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine
(90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%
) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical
antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (
23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazi
ne (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine. Conclusions: In contr
ast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training
doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone
reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. Th
ese results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a mo
re sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic d
rugs.