Spatial models of two-party or two-candidate competition almost never have
pure-strategy Nash equilibria when the issue space has more than one dimens
ion. This paper shows that the introduction of valence issues can create co
nditions where equilibria exist, even in a multidimensional setting. We der
ive sufficient conditions for the existence of equilibria, and characterize
the spatial locations of two competing parties or candidates when such equ
ilibria exist. The party with the advantage on the valence dimension will g
enerally take a moderate position on the positional issues. We consider the
implications of these results for public perceptions of the parties, incum
bency advantages, and realigning elections.