Failure patterns and hazard rates for failure suggest the cure of prostatecancer by external beam radiation

Citation
Al. Hanlon et Ge. Hanks, Failure patterns and hazard rates for failure suggest the cure of prostatecancer by external beam radiation, UROLOGY, 55(5), 2000, pp. 725-729
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00904295 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
725 - 729
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-4295(200005)55:5<725:FPAHRF>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objectives. To present patterns of failure and hazard rates for failure tha t support the concept of cure for patients with prostate cancer treated wit h external beam radiation (RT). Methods. Two patient groups are reported: 408 patients treated with PT alon e and 63 patients treated with RT and short-term androgen deprivation (RT+A D). All patients were treated between March 1987 and March 1995 and had at least 4 years of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up. The median foll ow-up was 69 months for the RT alone group and 60 months for the RT+AD grou p. For each treatment group, biochemical control and hazard functions were estimated using the ASTRO consensus definition of failure and the life tabl e method. Results. The 5 and 8-year biochemical control estimates were 60% and 59% fo r the RT alone group, respectively, with only two failures occurring after 5 years (1% of the total failures observed). Hazard function estimates indi cated a maximum risk of failure at 12 to 36 months, tapering to a low rate at 4 years, with no failures observed after 6 years. The differences in the patterns of failure by PSA level revealed a maximum risk of failure at 12 to 24 months (median 28) for a pretreatment PSA level of less than 10 ng/mL , 12 to 36 months (median 25) for a pretreatment PSA level of 10 to 19.9 ng /mL, and 12 to 36 months (median 22) fora pretreatment PSA level of 20 ng/m L or greater. The latter group reached low levels of risk at 6 years in con trast to 4 years for the patients presenting with pretreatment PSA levels o f less than 20 ng/mL. Similar patterns were observed when stratifying by st age and Gleason score: patients with a worse prognosis had the highest risk of failure earlier and achieved a low risk of failure later than patients with a more favorable prognosis. The patients in the RT+AD group had a diff erent pattern of risk of failure, with the highest risk immediately after t reatment, declining to a low risk of failure at 48 months. Conclusions. Patients treated with RT alone or RT+AD had little risk of fai lure after 4 to 6 years. Patients with a favorable prognosis achieved a low risk of failure sooner than high-risk patients when treated with RT alone. These results are consistent with the cure of prostate cancer by RT alone or RT+AD. UROLOGY 55: 725-729, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.