Characterization and anaerobic treatment of the sanitary landfill leachatein Istanbul

Citation
B. Inanc et al., Characterization and anaerobic treatment of the sanitary landfill leachatein Istanbul, WATER SCI T, 41(3), 2000, pp. 223-230
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
02731223 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
223 - 230
Database
ISI
SICI code
0273-1223(2000)41:3<223:CAATOT>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
In this study, characterization and anaerobic treatability of leachate from Komurcuoda Sanitary Landfill located on the Asian part of Istanbul were in vestigated. Time based fluctuations in characteristics of leachate were mon itored for an 8 month period. Samples were taken from a 200 m(3) holding ta nk located at the lowest elevation of the landfill. COD concentrations have ranged between 18800 and 47800 mg/l while BOD5 between 6820 and 38500 mg/L . COD and BOD5 values were higher in summer and lower in winter due to dilu tion by precipitation. On the other hand, it was quite interesting that suc h a dilution effect was not observed for ammonia. The highest ammonia conce ntration, 2690 mg/L was in November 1998. BOD5/COD ratio was larger than 0. 7 for most samples indicating high biodegradability, and acidic phase of de composition in the landfill. For anaerobic treatability, three different reactors, namely an upflow anae robic sludge bed reactor, an anaerobic upflow filter and a hybrid bed react or, were used. The anaerobic reactors were operated for more than 230 days and were continuing operation when this paper was prepared. Organic loading was increased gradually from 1.3 kgCOD/m(3).day to 8.2 kg COD/m(3).day whi le hydraulic retention time was reduced from 2.4 days to 2.0 days. All the reactors showed similar performances against organic loadings with efficien cies between 80% and 90%. However the reactors have experienced high ammoni a concentrations several times throughout the experimental period, and show ed different inhibition levels. Anaerobic filter was the least affected rea ctor while UASB was the most. Hybrid bed reactor has exhibited a similar pe rformance to anaerobic filter although not to the same degree.