As. Peters et al., Long-term outcomes of the new pathway program at Harvard medical school: Arandomized controlled trial, ACAD MED, 75(5), 2000, pp. 470-479
Purpose. To evaluate the long-term effects of an innovative curriculum, the
New Pathway (NP) Program, on behaviors and attitudes related to humanistic
medicine, lifelong learning, and social learning.
Method. Long-term follow-up of Harvard Medical School students who particip
ated in a randomized controlled trial. Descriptive study using 1998 telepho
ne interviews of 100 1989 and 1990 graduates (50 who had studied the NP cur
riculum, 50 who had studied the traditional curriculum). The NP Program con
sisted of problem-based learning tutorials, with coordinated lectures, labs
, experiences in humanistic medicine, and clinical experiences; the traditi
onal program consisted of basic science lectures and labs.
Results. Of 22 measures on the survey NP and traditional students differed
significantly on only five (three humanism; two social learning): 40% of NP
students and 18% of traditional students went on to practice primary care
or psychiatry. NP students rated their preparation to practice humanistic m
edicine higher than did traditional students and expressed more confidence
in their ability to manage patients with psychosocial problems. NP students
were more likely than were traditional students to believe that faculty fr
om the first two years continued to influence their thinking. NP students l
iked the pedagogic approaches of their program more than traditional studen
ts did. There was no difference between the groups on measures of lifelong
learning.
Conclusions. Differences between NP and traditional students in the humanis
m domain first appeared during medical school and residency and remained si
gnificant well into practice, suggesting that humanistic medicine can be ta
ught and learned.