Hm. Kim et al., Optimal management strategy for use of compression US for deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis, ACAD RADIOL, 7(2), 2000, pp. 67-76
Rationale and Objectives. The authors' purpose was to identify the optimal
strategy for using compression ultrasonography (US) in patients suspected o
f having deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
Materials and Methods. The authors developed a decision-analytic model repr
esenting the natural history of DVT and the benefits and risks of anticoagu
lation therapy. They evaluated six initial imaging strategies: (a) unilater
al examination of the common femoral and popliteal veins; (b) unilateral ex
amination of the common femoral, popliteal, and femoral veins; (c) bilatera
l examination of the common femoral and popliteal veins; (d) bilateral exam
ination of the common femoral, popliteal, and femoral veins; (e) complete u
nilateral examination of the symptomatic leg (including calf veins); and (f
) complete bilateral examination of both legs.
Results. For 65-year-old men with unilateral symptoms of DVT, the most effe
ctive strategy was bilateral examination of the common femoral and poplitea
l veins with anticoagulation therapy in patients with proximal DVT and foll
ow-up bilateral examination of the common femoral and popliteal veins in pa
tients without an initial diagnosis of DVT, with an incremental cost-effect
iveness ratio of $39,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained.
Conclusion. These results suggest that bilateral examination limited to the
common femoral and popliteal veins, with follow-up bilateral examination l
imited to the common femoral and popliteal veins, was as cost-effective as
other well-accepted medical interventions. The results were sensitive to th
e distribution of clot, diagnostic accuracy of compression US, and probabil
ity of bleeding with long-term morbidity.