A. Kogler et al., Postural stability using different neck positions in normal subjects and patients with neck trauma, ACT OTO-LAR, 120(2), 2000, pp. 151-155
Subjects with neck problems, such as whiplash injuries, often complain of d
isturbed equilibrium and, in some instances, provocation of the neck positi
on can elicit such problems. The importance of neck proprioceptors for main
taining balance is gaining increased interest, moreover the function or mal
function of the otoliths may disturb equilibrium in certain head positions.
The aim of the study was to create a reference material for postural contr
ol and its dependence on head position in healthy subjects and to compare t
his with a set of patients with known neck problems and associated vertigin
ous problems. A total of 32 healthy subjects (16 men, 16 women; age range 2
1-58 years) as well as 10 patients age range 27-62 years (mean 44 years) wi
th neck problems and associated balance problems since a whiplash injury we
re tested For postural control using the EquiTest dynamic posturographic mo
del. The normal subjects were initially split into four age groups in order
to estimate the effects of age on performance. The postural stability was
evaluated for dependence of support sur face conditions (stable or sway-ref
erenced), visual input (eyes open or closed) and head position (neutral, le
ft rotated, right rotated, extended backwards or flexed forward) using anal
ysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test in case of a significan
t factor effect. As expected, visual cues as well as stable support surface
improve postural stability (p < 0.001). Postural stability is statisticall
y different in the head extended backwards condition compared with the othe
r foul head positions (p < 0.001 in all cases) in both patients and control
s. Eliminating this test condition from the analysis, only a slight (p < 0.
05) difference between head forwards and head turned left remained. This pa
ttern of results remained if the normal subjects were only split into two a
ge groups instead of Four. Finally, the patient group exhibited significant
ly lower postural performance than all the groups of normal subjects (p < 0
.01), but none of the normal groups differed significantly from each other.
It is concluded that the postural control system is significantly challeng
ed in the head extended backwards condition in both normal subjects and pat
ients with previous whiplash injury and persistent neck problems. The patie
nt group differed statistically from all groups of normal subjects, This su
ggests that neck problems impair postural control, and that the head extend
ed position is a more challenging task for the postural system to adapt to.
Whether this is due to utricular malpositioning, central integrative funct
ions or cervical proprioceptive afferents is not within the scope of this s
tudy to answer.