Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from an intermittently flooded paddy field

Citation
A. Miyata et al., Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from an intermittently flooded paddy field, AGR FOR MET, 102(4), 2000, pp. 287-303
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
ISSN journal
01681923 → ACNP
Volume
102
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
287 - 303
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-1923(20000524)102:4<287:CDAMFF>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
To assess the role of floodwater in controlling the exchanges of CO2 and CH 4 from soil, floodwater and the canopy in intermittently flooded rice paddi es, an intensive field campaign (IREX96) was conducted in Japan during Augu st 1996. Eddy covariance was employed to measure fluxes of heat, water vapo r and CO2. The flux-gradient method was used to determine CH4 fluxes from m easured profiles of CH4 concentrations, with the required eddy diffusivity estimated using a modified aerodynamic approach or CO2 as a reference scala r. When the paddy was drained, net CO2 uptake from the atmosphere during da ytime was 23% less, and nighttime CO2 emissions were almost twice as great, than when the paddy was flooded. The mean daily CO2, uptake on the drained days was 14.5 g m(-2), <50% of the mean for the flooded days. These differ ences in the CO2 budget were mainly due to increased CO2 emissions from the soil surface under drained conditions resulting from the removal of the di ffusion barrier caused by the floodwater. Small changes in canopy photosynt hesis observed between flooded and drained paddies had little influence on the CO2 budget and could be explained by sensitivity of stomata to humidity saturation deficit. The CH4 flux for the drained paddy showed distinct diu rnal variation with a maximum of similar to 1.3 mu g CH4 m(-2) s(-1) in the afternoon, but after reflooding the peak flux decreased to <0.9 mu g CH4 m (-2) s(-1). Mean daily CH4 emissions were 28% larger for the drained paddy than when it was flooded. As with the CO2 flux, the larger CH4 flux on the drained days can be attributed to reduced resistance of CH-I transfer from the soil to air by removal of the floodwater. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V . All rights reserved.