Rj. Connor et al., Investigation of design and bias issues in case-control studies of cancer screening using microsimulation, AM J EPIDEM, 151(10), 2000, pp. 991-998
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Using a microsimulation approach, the authors examined design and bias issu
es in case-control studies of cancer screening. Specifically, they looked a
t the impact on the odds ratio of the way in which exposure to screening is
defined, the type of age matching, the time scale used, and the criteria u
sed to determine control eligibility. The results showed that defining expo
sure as "ever/never" screened produced, as expected, a serious bias in favo
r of screening. Defining exposure as being screened no later than the time
the case's cancer is diagnosed has a serious bias against screening. An alt
ernative exposure definition-screening can occur no later than the time the
case would have been clinically diagnosed-eliminates the bias against scre
ening. Further, the results showed that the type of age matching and the ti
me scale used can produce a bias against screening and that this bias can b
e quite strong when case-control studies are performed in populations with
a periodic screening program that is the only source of screening. Finally,
control eligibility criteria had little effect.