Investigation of design and bias issues in case-control studies of cancer screening using microsimulation

Citation
Rj. Connor et al., Investigation of design and bias issues in case-control studies of cancer screening using microsimulation, AM J EPIDEM, 151(10), 2000, pp. 991-998
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029262 → ACNP
Volume
151
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
991 - 998
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(20000515)151:10<991:IODABI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Using a microsimulation approach, the authors examined design and bias issu es in case-control studies of cancer screening. Specifically, they looked a t the impact on the odds ratio of the way in which exposure to screening is defined, the type of age matching, the time scale used, and the criteria u sed to determine control eligibility. The results showed that defining expo sure as "ever/never" screened produced, as expected, a serious bias in favo r of screening. Defining exposure as being screened no later than the time the case's cancer is diagnosed has a serious bias against screening. An alt ernative exposure definition-screening can occur no later than the time the case would have been clinically diagnosed-eliminates the bias against scre ening. Further, the results showed that the type of age matching and the ti me scale used can produce a bias against screening and that this bias can b e quite strong when case-control studies are performed in populations with a periodic screening program that is the only source of screening. Finally, control eligibility criteria had little effect.