Despite a recent increase in the attention given to improving end-of-life c
are, our understanding of what constitutes a good death is surprisingly lac
king. The purpose of this study was to gather descriptions of the component
s of a good death from patients, families, and providers through focus grou
p discussions and in-depth interviews. Seventy-five participants-including
physicians, nurses. social workers, chaplains, hospice volunteers, patients
, and recently bereaved family members-were recruited from a university med
ical center, a Veterans Affairs medical center, and a community hospice.
Participants identified six major components of a good death: pain and symp
tom management, clear decision making, preparation for death, completion, c
ontributing to others, and affirmation of the whole person. The six themes
are process-oriented attributes of a good death, and each has biomedical, p
sychological, social, and spiritual components. Physicians' discussions of
a good death differed greatly from those of other groups. Physicians offere
d the most biomedical perspective, and patients, families, and other health
care professionals defined a broad range of attributes integral to the qua
lity of dying.
Although there is no "right" way to die, these six themes may be used as a
framework for understanding what participants tend to value at the end of l
ife. Biomedical care is critical, but it is only a point of departure towar
d total end-of-life care. For patients and families, psychosocial and spiri
tual issues are as important as physiologic concerns.