Violence prevention in the emergency department - Clinician attitudes and limitations

Citation
Ja. Fein et al., Violence prevention in the emergency department - Clinician attitudes and limitations, ARCH PED AD, 154(5), 2000, pp. 495-498
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10724710 → ACNP
Volume
154
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
495 - 498
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-4710(200005)154:5<495:VPITED>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objective: To assess emergency department (ED) clinicians' attitudes and be haviors regarding identification, assessment, and intervention for youth at risk for violence in the ED. Design: Anonymous, cross-sectional written questionnaire. Setting: The EDs of 3 urban hospitals. Subjects: Emergency medicine residents and faculty, pediatric residents, pe diatric emergency medicine fellows and faculty, and ED nurses. Results: A total of 184 (88%) of 208 clinicians completed the questionnaire . Only 15% correctly recognized the lack of existing protocols for addressi ng youth violence. Clinicians reported being most active in identification of at-risk youth (93% asking context of injury and 82% determining relation ships of victim and perpetrator), with pediatricians being more active than general ED clinicians (87% vs 68%; P<.01). Clinicians less often reported performing assessments or referrals of at-risk youth. Nurses and physicians were no different in their reported identification, assessment, or referra l behaviors. Barriers identified include concern over upsetting family memb ers, lack of time or skills, and concern for personal safety. Additional cl inician training, information about community resources, and specially trai ned on-site staff were noted by respondents as potential solutions. Conclusions: Emergency department clinicians recognize the need for evaluat ion of youth at risk for violence. They are able to identify violently inju red youth, but less often perform risk assessment to guide patients to appr opriate follow-up resources. Further investigation should address clinician barriers to the complete care of violently injured youth in the ED.