F. Tankere et al., Further evidence for a central reorganisation of synaptic connectivity in patients with hypoglossal-facial anastomosis in man, BRAIN RES, 864(1), 2000, pp. 87-94
In normal subjects, electrical stimulation of trigeminal mucosal afferents
(lingual nerve - V3) can elicit a short latency (12.5+/-0.3 ms; mean+/-S.D.
) reflex response in the ipsilateral genioglossus muscle (Maisonobe et al.,
Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in norma
l human subjects. Brain Res. 1998;810:220-228). In the present study on pat
ients with hypoglossal-facial (XII-VII) nerve anastomoses, we were able to
record similar R1-type blink reflex responses in the orbicularis oculi musc
les, following stimulation of either supraorbital nerve (V1) or lingual ner
ve (V3) afferents. However, these responses were not present in normal cont
rol subjects. Voluntary swallowing movements produced clear-cut facilitatio
ns of the R1 blink reflex response elicited by stimulation of VI afferents.
In a conditioning-test procedure with a variable inter-stimulus interval,
the R1 blink reflex response elicited by supraorbital nerve stimulation was
facilitated by an ipsilateral mucosal conditioning stimulus in the V3 regi
on. This facilitatory effect was maximal when the two stimuli (conditioning
and test) were applied simultaneously. This effect was not observed on the
R1 component of the blink reflex in the normal control subjects. These dat
a strongly suggest that in patients with XII-VII anastomoses, but not in no
rmal subjects, both cutaneous (VI) and mucosal (V3) trigeminal afferents pr
oject onto the same interneurones in the trigeminal principal sensory nucle
us. This clearly supports the idea that peripheral manipulation of the VIIt
h and the XIIth nerves induces a plastic change within this nucleus. (C) 20
00 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.